Sunday, September 18, 2011

EWOT Goggles #2

In recitation this week, we talked a little bit about incentives, which is a commonly discussed topic in economics.

Specifically, my TA Alex and I talked after class about the implication of a specific situation that I face in my real life on a weekly basis.

Three days a week, I go into downtown Rochester to work a job at a local radio station. I do not have a car on campus, thus transportation is often an issue for me.

To get downtown, I have one of two options:

1. Call a cab
2. Ask my friend who has a car to take me
Taxi is the way I'm getting to work from now on because
I now understand how significant it is for someone to
have a important incentive to properly get a job done.

Every single time I have went to my job this year, I have called a taxi and have had to spend $24 roundtrip. Each time though, I am tempted to ask my friend to get a free ride.

But as I learned in my recitation class, even though it is much more expensive, calling a taxi is actually there more economically intelligent way to travel. Here is why:

I need to get to work by 3pm. If I am late, I risk being fired, which would be very bad because my job is a very good resume booster for what I want to do with my life someday- be a sports radio personality.

Therefore, I really can't afford to be late to work and risk being fired- the opportunity to work where I work is a once in a lifetime opportunity and it will allow me to learn the requisite skills to someday become a successful sports talk radio host.

Because of the risk involved in not getting to work on time, I am better off calling a taxi because of the incentives each person would receive for taking me.

The taxi driver has the incentive of being paid. Because of this, he has a lot of reason to pick me up on time and be reliable, because if he doesn't, I might never call him again for business or will not give him a tip. In short, he is very likely to pick me up on time because his incentive is money, which is necessary to have in today's world.

My friend's incentive to take me is ultimately nothing- perhaps it is just feeling good about doing a favor for a friend. But, because there is not as great of an incentive for my friend, there is more of a chance that my friend will either:
  1. forget to take me and not come
  2. not be in the mood to take me, so just not come
Therefore, from here on out, I am definitely going to call a taxi to take me to work. It makes a lot of sense when thinking economically about it as well.

There is a much better chance that I will get to work on time when I call a taxi, because his incentive is so great. A taxi driver is a taxi driver for basically one reason only: to make money and to make a living. Therefore, money is a taxi driver's ultimate incentive. When an ultimate incentive is at stake, there is a much better chance that someone will get a job done- and do the job well.

Because the incentive for my friend to take me is not the "ultimate" incentive, there is less of a chance that he will be reliable and do that job he would be set out to do if he agreed to take me to work.

1 comment:

  1. Very good. The key is that there is not enough altruism in the world to expect someone, even a close friend, to do something for you out of the goodness of his or her heart. That is not to say that altruism doesn't exist, but that you can't expect and rely upon it. Nor would you probably even want to rely on it if it was widespread; if I didn't compensate someone for doing a service for me, I would feel bad about that. Someone who takes me to the airport deserves to be paid, and it puts me in an awkward position if it is my friend who takes me, for am I supposed to pay him or not?

    ReplyDelete